Volume 27, Issue 3 (10-2025)
yafte 2025, 27(3): 137-143 |
Back to browse issues page
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Behzadifar M. Editorial. yafte 2025; 27 (3) :137-143
URL: http://yafte.lums.ac.ir/article-1-3925-en.html
URL: http://yafte.lums.ac.ir/article-1-3925-en.html
Social Determinants of Health Research Center, Lorestan University of Medical Sciences, Khorramabad, Iran
Abstract: (17 Views)
The Iranian health system cannot be captured with a single word or a simple model; it resembles a multi‑story structure in which each level is built upon a different set of values, logics, and political paradigms. At times, the system reflects strong state influence; at others, it is molded by ideals of social justice, insurance‑based financing, or the dynamics of the private market. Simultaneously, it contains one of the world’s most established primary health care networks. This coexistence has created a uniquely blended system often described as a mixed health system. In this text, we examine the most influential political paradigms shaping Iran’s health system and illustrate how each contributes to its current policies, structures, and performance.
One of the foundational paradigms guiding Iran’s health policies is the justice‑oriented paradigm. Rooted in the country’s constitutional and policy frameworks, this paradigm positions health not as a commodity but as a universal right. The justice‑oriented approach seeks to ensure equitable access to services, reduce health disparities, and protect vulnerable groups. Its influence is especially clear in programs such as the national primary health care network, universal health insurance expansion, the family physician program, and the referral system. Iran’s rural health houses and health worker model (Behvarz) stand among the most successful examples globally, significantly improving maternal and child health, infectious disease control, and vaccination coverage (1).
This justice‑driven orientation is not limited to legal texts; it has materialized through decades of efforts to expand insurance coverage, decrease out‑of‑pocket payments, and strengthen preventive services. Despite these gains, challenges remain, including geographic inequalities, uneven distribution of specialists, and the high cost of some services. Still, equity continues to serve as a core guiding principle for Iran’s health policies.
The second major paradigm shaping the system is state‑centrism. The government plays a dominant role in regulation, financing, service provision, and workforce training. Most hospitals and a significant share of outpatient services are publicly owned and managed through the Ministry of Health and its affiliated medical universities. This creates a structure where the state simultaneously acts as policymaker, regulator, purchaser, and provider of care (2).
Such a system offers advantages: policy coherence, coordinated national planning, and the ability to extend services to underserved regions. However, it also brings limitations, including administrative complexity, slower reform processes, and role conflicts between regulation and service delivery. For years, one of the core debates in Iran’s health sector has been the need to more clearly separate stewardship from service delivery to enhance efficiency and accountability.
A third influential paradigm is the social health insurance model. For several decades, a significant portion of health financing in Iran has been structured through insurance organizations, such as the Social Security Organization, Iran Health Insurance Organization, and military insurance funds. Social insurance is based on contributions from employees, employers, and government, representing a contractual relationship between the state and citizens (3).
Iran’s multi‑payer insurance landscape has contributed to fragmentation, with different funds offering varying benefits, payment structures, and population coverage. This has led to inequalities in insurance benefits and inefficiencies in financial management. Recent reforms, including efforts toward harmonizing basic benefit packages and promoting strategic purchasing, aim to strengthen this paradigm and reduce inconsistencies. Achieving a more unified and efficient insurance system remains an ongoing challenge.
The fourth paradigm evident in Iran’s health system is the market and private‑sector paradigm. While the public sector is dominant, the private sector holds substantial influence, particularly in specialized and tertiary care. Private hospitals, specialty clinics, diagnostic centers, and elective services are major components of the system. Out‑of‑pocket spending still constitutes a considerable share of health financing, reflecting the presence of market mechanisms in service provision (4).
The private sector contributes benefits such as service diversity, shorter wait times, and potential quality improvements driven by competition. However, it can also exacerbate cost escalation, provider‑induced demand, and inequalities in access. Balancing the role of government and market forces continues to be a sensitive policy issue, with ongoing discussions about how best to regulate private providers, align incentives, and reduce financial burdens on households.
The final major paradigm shaping Iran’s system is the community‑based and primary health care paradigm. Inspired by the Alma‑Ata declaration, this approach emphasizes prevention, health education, community empowerment, and universal access to essential services. Iran’s primary health care network, initiated in the 1980s, is widely recognized as one of the country’s most significant health achievements. The rural health house model, urban health centers, and the structured referral system exemplify this paradigm in practice (5).
This model has been instrumental in controlling communicable diseases, expanding maternal and child health programs, and supporting national vaccination initiatives. Even as the nation faces rising burdens of non‑communicable diseases, aging populations, and lifestyle changes, the primary care network remains a cornerstone of the health system and a foundation for future reforms (6).
In summary, Iran’s health system is shaped by the interaction of multiple political paradigms. This pluralistic nature, while complex, allows for adaptability in addressing the diverse health needs of the population. The coexistence of justice‑orientation, state‑centrism, social insurance, private market dynamics, and strong primary care has yielded both significant accomplishments and structural challenges. Moving forward, the key lies in achieving a balanced alignment among these paradigms, recognizing that each addresses essential dimensions of health system function. A more integrated approach one that harmonizes these frameworks holds the potential to strengthen efficiency, equity, and sustainability across Iran’s health landscape.
One of the foundational paradigms guiding Iran’s health policies is the justice‑oriented paradigm. Rooted in the country’s constitutional and policy frameworks, this paradigm positions health not as a commodity but as a universal right. The justice‑oriented approach seeks to ensure equitable access to services, reduce health disparities, and protect vulnerable groups. Its influence is especially clear in programs such as the national primary health care network, universal health insurance expansion, the family physician program, and the referral system. Iran’s rural health houses and health worker model (Behvarz) stand among the most successful examples globally, significantly improving maternal and child health, infectious disease control, and vaccination coverage (1).
This justice‑driven orientation is not limited to legal texts; it has materialized through decades of efforts to expand insurance coverage, decrease out‑of‑pocket payments, and strengthen preventive services. Despite these gains, challenges remain, including geographic inequalities, uneven distribution of specialists, and the high cost of some services. Still, equity continues to serve as a core guiding principle for Iran’s health policies.
The second major paradigm shaping the system is state‑centrism. The government plays a dominant role in regulation, financing, service provision, and workforce training. Most hospitals and a significant share of outpatient services are publicly owned and managed through the Ministry of Health and its affiliated medical universities. This creates a structure where the state simultaneously acts as policymaker, regulator, purchaser, and provider of care (2).
Such a system offers advantages: policy coherence, coordinated national planning, and the ability to extend services to underserved regions. However, it also brings limitations, including administrative complexity, slower reform processes, and role conflicts between regulation and service delivery. For years, one of the core debates in Iran’s health sector has been the need to more clearly separate stewardship from service delivery to enhance efficiency and accountability.
A third influential paradigm is the social health insurance model. For several decades, a significant portion of health financing in Iran has been structured through insurance organizations, such as the Social Security Organization, Iran Health Insurance Organization, and military insurance funds. Social insurance is based on contributions from employees, employers, and government, representing a contractual relationship between the state and citizens (3).
Iran’s multi‑payer insurance landscape has contributed to fragmentation, with different funds offering varying benefits, payment structures, and population coverage. This has led to inequalities in insurance benefits and inefficiencies in financial management. Recent reforms, including efforts toward harmonizing basic benefit packages and promoting strategic purchasing, aim to strengthen this paradigm and reduce inconsistencies. Achieving a more unified and efficient insurance system remains an ongoing challenge.
The fourth paradigm evident in Iran’s health system is the market and private‑sector paradigm. While the public sector is dominant, the private sector holds substantial influence, particularly in specialized and tertiary care. Private hospitals, specialty clinics, diagnostic centers, and elective services are major components of the system. Out‑of‑pocket spending still constitutes a considerable share of health financing, reflecting the presence of market mechanisms in service provision (4).
The private sector contributes benefits such as service diversity, shorter wait times, and potential quality improvements driven by competition. However, it can also exacerbate cost escalation, provider‑induced demand, and inequalities in access. Balancing the role of government and market forces continues to be a sensitive policy issue, with ongoing discussions about how best to regulate private providers, align incentives, and reduce financial burdens on households.
The final major paradigm shaping Iran’s system is the community‑based and primary health care paradigm. Inspired by the Alma‑Ata declaration, this approach emphasizes prevention, health education, community empowerment, and universal access to essential services. Iran’s primary health care network, initiated in the 1980s, is widely recognized as one of the country’s most significant health achievements. The rural health house model, urban health centers, and the structured referral system exemplify this paradigm in practice (5).
This model has been instrumental in controlling communicable diseases, expanding maternal and child health programs, and supporting national vaccination initiatives. Even as the nation faces rising burdens of non‑communicable diseases, aging populations, and lifestyle changes, the primary care network remains a cornerstone of the health system and a foundation for future reforms (6).
In summary, Iran’s health system is shaped by the interaction of multiple political paradigms. This pluralistic nature, while complex, allows for adaptability in addressing the diverse health needs of the population. The coexistence of justice‑orientation, state‑centrism, social insurance, private market dynamics, and strong primary care has yielded both significant accomplishments and structural challenges. Moving forward, the key lies in achieving a balanced alignment among these paradigms, recognizing that each addresses essential dimensions of health system function. A more integrated approach one that harmonizes these frameworks holds the potential to strengthen efficiency, equity, and sustainability across Iran’s health landscape.
Type of Study: Original Research |
Received: 2026/05/6 | Accepted: 2025/10/2 | Published: 2025/10/2
Received: 2026/05/6 | Accepted: 2025/10/2 | Published: 2025/10/2
Send email to the article author
| Rights and permissions | |
 |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |
